city council district 6 v corona del mar & newport coast
Nancy Gardner
councilwoman v newport beach, california
december UPDATE
GROUP HOMES
We are in the final stages of formulating an ordinance to address the
overconcentration of group homes in the city. We are trying to craft something
that will alleviate the problem and stand up in court, not an easy task when
recovering addicts are classed as handicapped, 6-and-under licensed homes must
be treated no differently than any other single family residence, etc. Some
residents are unhappy with what is proposed and apparently are contemplating
bringing a lawsuit against the City for not adopting a “Damn the torpedoes, full
speed ahead” approach.
DREDGING
Because we continue to be shortchanged on federal funding, there is a concern
that the Upper Bay restoration project will run out of money before the job is
complete. To pull the equipment out and come back later will add at least one
million dollars to the cost of the project. At a recent meeting of the Newport
Bay Executive Committee, the City proposed that before letting that happen, the
watershed participants put up the necessary money to finish the job under our
agreed apportionment (County, 28.25%; TIC, 23.61%; Newport, 16.53%, Irvine,
17.48%; Tustin, 7.28%; Lake Forest, 6.85%). This was not greeted with delirious
enthusiasm by the others, but at least it’s on the table if we continue to come
up short.
CROSSWALK AT
IRIS
To be pedestrian-oriented, as CdM wishes to be, you have to be able to get from
one side of the street to the other. Those who have used the crosswalk at Iris
know just how perilous this can be with downhill traffic and the general
disinclination of motorists to stop. In the “City of Newport Beach Improving
Pedestrian Circulation Along Coast Highway in Corona del Mar Final Report”
(catchy title, what?), the traffic engineers proposed a traffic signal as the
safest option. This set off alarms among those living on the ocean side of Iris.
Already impacted by traffic from the Albertson’s shopping center, they feared
that a signal would bring even more cars as people started using Iris instead of
Marguerite to turn left onto Coast Highway. The solution: a pedestrian-operated
signal, right-turn only, with an improved highway median to insure that cars
can’t turn left.
PANINI’S
There is a great deal of interest in the proposed move of Panini’s restaurant
from its current location to the former site of the Orient Handel rug store. Any
restaurant would be happy to have the strong customer backing that Panini’s
enjoys. Council members have received numerous emails from people who don’t
understand why there could be any controversy over a restaurant moving one
block, especially one that doesn’t have a hard liquor license, closes at ten and
has a lot of pedestrian traffic as opposed to vehicle traffic. Nearby residents,
however, already coexisting with six eating establishments in a two-block area,
are concerned that the change from a rug store to a restaurant will negatively
impact an area already buffeted by parking needs of employees, customers and
deliveries. Since use permits run with the land, not with the
establishment, Council has to consider the potential addition of another
restaurant in Panini’s current site and its impact, as well. The matter has been
continued at Panini’s request until next year.
FIRE DANGER
A number of years ago, the City wanted to clean out a lot of the vegetation in
Buck Gully as a fire prevention measure. This met with strong opposition from
residents, and a compromise was reached that meant a less restrictive fuel
modification policy in Buck Gully, but even the less restrictive standards are
not always met.
At a recent study session, the Fire Marshal indicated that before the recent
fires, there were thirty properties on Buck Gully that were not in compliance
with fuel modification requirements. The message got out, however, and after the
fires, there were only four. Council has asked the Marshal to take a fresh look
at the Buck Gully requirements and come back with any proposals he feels would
make the area safer. Meanwhile, it was good to learn that in Newport Coast, the
community associations were all in compliance with their fuel modification
requirements.
SIGNED: ANON.
Even if I don’t agree with what they say, I admire people who stand up and say
it. There has always been a newspaper policy that people have to sign their
names to letters if they want them published. Editors realize that people feel
much freer to let fly if they are cloaked in anonymity, as opposed to standing
fully identified with their statements. I wish the Daily Pilot would extend the
same policy to the quotes it prints from bloggers.
.
WHAT DO YOU THINK?
> CdM Parking
> Palm Trees
> City Hall Location
> Other
Concerns
FUTURE TOPIC SUGGESTIONS
This is a two-way process, so please don’t hesitate to contact me with your ideas and opinions.
Councilwoman Nancy Gardner
QUALITY OF LIFE Advocate FOR NEWPORT BEACH
City of Newport Beach - 3300 Newport Blvd - Newport Beach, CA 92663
Phone: 949.644.3004 - EMAIL: gardnerncy@aol.com
Copyright 2007 v Nancy Gardner v All Rights Reserved