city council district 6 v corona del mar & newport coast
Nancy Gardner
council member v newport beach, california
newsletter: september 2010
NEW ZONING CODE
Since the General Plan was passed, many minds have been working on bringing
the zoning code into line with the general plan’s new policies. A big bump
in the road occurred with the residential section where it was proposed to
ditch floor area limits (FAL) in favor of open air space. I found the idea
of open air space very exciting because if every home has mandates for open
air space, we have solved the JWA problem (No, you may not fly over my 35x65
sf of air space!). Of course my interpretation was completely wrong. What
the phrase meant was that there would be a requirement for a specified
square footage of cutouts – porches, balconies, whatever. Once a house met
that criteria, along with the height and setbacks, then it could be built
with no reference to square footage. This was supposed to simplify things.
Community outreach showed a great deal of confusion, and even when there was
understanding, a significant lack of support for this new approach, and so
it looks like we’ll be reverting to our current FAL.
FEES
Over the last year the council has looked at special events and the best
approach for the city to take. One conclusion was that more city costs
should be recaptured, even for charitable events. Nobody seemed to object to
this move–until their particular event was hit with higher fees. It was sort
of like with the civic center. “Yes, you should bring down the costs, but
no! You should not cut my particular part of the project.” In this case it’s
been, “Yes, you should be fiscally responsible and raise fees. What, you
mean me?” Nobody wants to dampen the enthusiasm for these events, but since
city funds are everyone’s funds, and because right now there is a lesser
amount, this new approach is necessary.
THE SILLY SEASON, OR I–I–I
Yes, another election. Does it seem like we have them every other month? Be
prepared for the onslaught of mailers, some of which will rival the best
novels (meaning a lot of fiction), robocalls (which automatically disqualify
a candidate for me), and signs on all the public rights of way where they
are not supposed to be and where staff often has to risk life and limb to
remove them. Also be prepared for an enormous overuse of the first person
pronoun. It is one of the unfortunate aspects of running for office that you
have to use the “I” word a lot, and since language affects thought, this may
explain some things.
ENFORCEMENT CONCERNS
Code enforcement draws a lot of complaints. There are those
(usually the cited) who compare city code enforcement staff to storm
troopers. Others question whether we have any enforcement at all. Our
enforcement is primarily complaint-based. If a code enforcement officer
notices milky runoff from a construction site, he/she doesn’t wait for some
passerby to complain. He goes to the source and handles it. Same with
building inspectors. If they’re driving to a site and along the way they see
construction occurring without permits, they’ll red-tag the project until
necessary permits are obtained. However, staff doesn’t peek into windows or
over fences looking for transgressions, so if you have a bootleg unit and
none of your neighbors know or care, you’re probably home free. In case you
feel there is a code violation and you want it attended to, the number to
call is 644-3215.
SOME EXCITING SUMMER READING
If you haven’t seen the latest (July/August) copy of Storm Water, The
Journal of Surface Water Quality Professionals, run to the nearest
newsstand, or more likely, the web, for an article by our own Jack Skinner
and city employee John Kappeler which describes their simple but interesting
experiment on gutters and biofilms. On the off chance that this isn’t at the
top of your reading list, the significant thread is that certain tests for
recreational water quality may give results that overestimate the health
threat to swimmers. If this is substantiated by further testing, it could
well change the way we test for water quality.
FUTURE TOPIC SUGGESTIONS
This is a two-way process, so please don’t hesitate to contact me with your ideas and opinions.
Council Member Nancy Gardner
QUALITY OF LIFE Advocate FOR NEWPORT BEACH
City of Newport Beach | 3300 Newport Blvd | Newport Beach, CA 92663
Phone: 949.644.3004 | EMAIL: gardnerncy@aol.com
Copyright 2010 v Nancy Gardner v All Rights Reserved