city council district 6 v corona del mar & newport coast
Nancy Gardner
council member v newport beach, california
![]()
newsletter: february 2011
	CURRENT CITY HALL SITE
	Lots of interesting ideas and opinions. The general direction at 
	this point is a combination of public use such as a community center and a 
	residential component, but there are lots of questions: Should the emphasis 
	be on generating maximum revenue from the site with a small public facility 
	and more housing, or should this be the site of a major community center 
	along the lines of Newport Coast with a smaller housing component? If the 
	latter, should the existing West Newport Center on 15th Street be converted 
	to housing to generate income? How does a community facility on the city 
	hall site affect plans for Marina Park? There’s also a proposed promenade 
	through the various properties and potentially a canal. The promenade has 
	gotten universal support, the canal a mix with some concerned about water 
	quality issues and others feeling that blue space would be more productively 
	used as green space. It’s an ongoing process so chime in.
 
	PORT THEATER
	When I was in high school, one of my friends whose father was an architect 
	wouldn’t let him go to the Port Theater because he felt it was seismically 
	unsound. Well, if an earthquake hits, and I’m anywhere near there, I’m 
	ducking into the Port. One reason it hasn’t come along as quickly as many 
	had hoped is that they have done major retrofitting with big steel beams and 
	trusses, not an easy job in an existing building, but now most of that is 
	completed, and they anticipate being open this year. As you may recall, the 
	idea is to provide a more upscale movie experience that includes dining 
	which counts me out. I’m crabby enough about the movie-going public with 
	their cell phones and chatter. Add food service, and I’d just as soon watch 
	it on my TV. Meanwhile, the Island cinemas at Fashion Island are closed for 
	remodeling, to the consternation of the Newport Beach Film Festival which 
	this year will be the Newport-Costa Mesa-Irvine-and-other-sites-as-necessary 
	Film Festival. 
 
	NEW ANTI-SCAVENGING ORDINANCE
	People going through trash cans present privacy issues as well as 
	loss of revenue for the city when recyclables are removed. Apparently, the 
	money can be pretty good because certain individuals bring in teams to cover 
	an area which raises the potential, I would think, for criminal activity. 
	The city has kicked it up to a misdemeanor to go through someone else’s 
	trash in the hope of discouraging the activity. The police will respond if 
	not on a more urgent matter, and during the day, Code Enforcement can also 
	be contacted by phone at        644-3215.
	ONE AND DONE
	I’m talking this up. A few years ago it was being discussed 
	fairly seriously–the idea that the Army Corps of Engineers would come in and 
	dredge the harbor (One) and then the city would take over all responsibility 
	(Done). The reason I like it is it’s something that might actually happen. 
	ACE admits that it has a dredging responsibility, but it never has the 
	funds, and given the current make up of Congress, it doesn’t look like 
	that’s going to change.   BUT . . . if we could go to the feds and show them 
	that One and Done actually saves the federal government money over the 
	course, we might make some headway. Obviously, there would be ongoing costs 
	to the city, but we could put a plan together that would do regular 
	small-scale dredging at a reasonable cost instead of every eighty years when 
	the costs are so huge. As for eel grass, it’s looking like the controlling 
	agencies may accept the city’s plan. Right now, the individual is on the 
	hook for mitigating any loss of eel grass, and the process is arduous, to 
	say the least. Under our proposal, the city would guarantee to maintain a 
	certain amount of eel grass in the bay, and as long as we met the standard, 
	we could issue dredging permits to the individuals. 
	
	HOW BIG IS BIG
	One of the issues that is going to be addressed in the near 
	future is the size of boats in the harbor–should there be a limit. One point 
	of view says that if it can be parked–sorry, moored–there’s no problem. 
	Others feel that large vessels make navigation difficult for other boats. 
	Some also make a distinction between large private boats which make 
	occasional voyages and are not used for cruises around the bay and 
	commercial boats which may go out daily and that’s exactly where they 
	go–around the bay. With a harbor that has kayakers, paddlers, sailors, 
	anglers, racers and every degree of expertise from zero to the Olympics, 
	it’s a balancing act.
 
FUTURE TOPIC SUGGESTIONS
This is a two-way process, so please don’t hesitate to contact me with your ideas and opinions.
Council Member Nancy Gardner
QUALITY OF LIFE Advocate FOR NEWPORT BEACH
City of Newport Beach | 3300 Newport Blvd | Newport Beach, CA 92663
Phone: 949.644.3004 | EMAIL: gardnerncy@aol.com
Copyright 2011 v Nancy Gardner v All Rights Reserved